Jornada divulgativa: Els Recursos Naturals i el Reaprofitament de Materials

Jornada divulgativa: Els Recursos Naturals i el Reaprofitament de Materials

RmtWroOMBw

rLWJUaTinIFMe

ZGBiskHJVrxCYNEWQXB

Clearly there are iuesss with the implicit transitive trust that happens when people reuse passwords. The answer remains the same get rid of the passwords (or at least shore them up with stronger means).I would be completely happy with explicit transitive trust (e.g. OpenID) if it was backed by strong auth. Services like MyOpenID.com do a good job in this respect, but what's presently missing from the protocol is a means for an RP to determine whether a claim was strongly authenticated (so my RP that uses MyOpenID.com or whatever doesn't know if I used password, cert, OTP or whatever). That's what needs to be fixed, as until it is I can't say to my service provider that they should trust an IDP that I use but only if I strongly authenticate. This leaves a small window of opportunity for an OpenID provider that only accepts strong auth, then educated consumers can choose.

PVjIoIfpabjpydjKMsN

CYilkjpEYAmatyLRH

WFvvqREKcdrvurZ

You ralely saved my skin with this information. Thanks!

EEYSqYssizLwGjWHatN

sbFulcbirChKItdU

Agree. You can add1. Automatically logigng out after 5 minutes for security reasons 2. Ignoring tabbed browsing behavior by making some kind of silly java script pop up window that doesn't work in tabs3. Sites that don't allow right click to open in new tab, I think because they think this means people can't copy pictures 4. Using flash for navigation (again, no way to open in tabs)

QaULgkHbGYcINvDC

mVFnQOyUpsp

I'm with Jenny... what about the dog? I'm alcautly serious... I have to know before I read this one. I'm the same way with movies. I never saw I Am Legend because of certain reasons having to do with this question (I'm being vague to try to protect the others who haven't seen it. Yes, I know i'm doing it badly...). I just can't do it.Tell me! O_o<3

NDVwTxUjIsQaccX

zsftdzjsOkPmvlBAnoO

I don’t think that you win by being open, per se, but by enabling relevant functionality in a way that works for non-developer-types. If you make it free, and make it accessible, and give a lot of influence to a decentralized community of spreaders, you can see the kind of success that Firefox has had elsewhere.To wit, Firefox didn’t necessarily do anything different than Internet Explorer, except support web standards, make tabbed browsing more accessible, and limit the spread of mal- and spyware. But Firefox would not have existed had Internet Explorer not grown to monopoly scale and then stagnated.Similarly, the contest between Friend Connect and OpenID (and the related cadre of Open Stack technologies) has needed a proprietary example of where this stuff is going to get the open source community motivated to commoditize it. Rarely do we see good design leadership from open source technologies; instead we see open developers want to do cool things or serve their own needs and not have to answer to a central authority.Once Facebook Connect does capture more mindshare and real estate, I believe it’s then that open source will react. Fortunately, there will be enough meat on the bones of OpenID, OAuth, PoCo, Activity Streams and other DiSo-esque technologies that it won’t take too long to catch up.Your point is well taken; we do need a killer app to demonstrate the value of OpenID. But I think it will come in time. I’m actually not too worried about that. I am, however, more worried about whether OpenID will stay true to its roots or be corrupted by short-sighted corporate involvement.

cheap auto insurance quotes

Envia un nou comentari

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.